Room For Only One At The Top …

Kells vs. Bishop in battle of the best

Reporter Dave Carter of The Gazette, whose beat includes coverage of Les Quebecois of the National Lacrosse League, provides this analysis of coaches Jim Bishop and Morley Kells. Bishop, an advocate of speed and agility, has his Les Quebecois in second place. Kells, who stressed strength and the shooting game, has his Tomahawks on top of the league and has beaten Bishop in seven of eight meetings this season.

The names are Morley Kells and Jim Bishop. Simple, direct, no non­sense names. Simple, direct, no nonsense men in a game as sudden as a summer storm and where vio­lence is as swift as sheet light­ning.

One patrols the aisle behind the bench of the Long Island Toma­hawks. the other the pathway be­hind the hunched backs and sweat­ing faces of Les Quebecois.

Both are intense. Both are sure of the rightness of their systems.

Both are committed to the Lombar­dian premise that winning is not everything, so much as it is the only thing.

But there are differences and in the cases of Kells, coach and general man­ager of the Long Island franchise in the National Lacrosse League, and Bishop, who occupies the same portfolios for the Montreal team, they very well may spell the distinction of first and second place.

And that, precisely, is where it stands now as the teams approach the end of the regular season and prepare for the playoffs in this, the second year of the league s existence.

Kells and Bishop have been rivals for years and, indeed, there is little se­cret that in the competition to decide the best of the best, the sweetest vic­tories are the ones that come at the other’s expense.

Who’s crying now?

Bishop got the first laugh this sea­son when he spoiled the Tomahawks’ debut in their new Long Island home when Les Quebecois stole a 14-13 vic­tory on Wayne Finck’s goal with 13 seconds remaining in the game.

Kells has been laughing ever since.

Long Island has won its last seven games against Les Quebecois, includ­ing four in front of home crowds at the Forum.

Both men abide by a system that de­crees the player must want to play the game the way the coach and general manager thinks it should be played or, alternatively, play it somewhere else.

Such a case was Jim Lynch, rookie of the year in 1974 and the happiest member of Les Quebecois, whose dis­enchantement was immediate when Bishop was named coach and GM.

Bishop traded him to the Philadel­phia Wings in exchange for Ross Jones, unhappy with the way things were going in the City of Brotherly Love, but who was able to accept Bishop’s de­manding schedule of physical fitness.

Desire to win…

Bishop and Kells worn with a sys­tem and those who cannot abide by it eventually find themselves in other cities. Both explain it as a desire to win.

Just how much Kells is committed is reflected by the story out of Roches­ter last season in which he was accused of stealing every running shoe from the Philadelphia dressing room before a game in the finals.

“I like to win but I’d never go to that extent.” he says, a grin splitting his puckish features. There is a hint in the smile that he didn’t do it. as many accused him of doing, men perhaps it wasn t a bad idea and might do some other time.

Kells’ Tomahawks have the mark of a winner about them this season and the thinking around the league is that only an upset of major proportions sep­arates Long Island from a Nations Cup triumph.

Bishop, meanwhile, is having diffi­culty maintaining the pace in the latter stages of the season of the fast break style that is the trademark of all the teams he has coached.

The fast break…

“I like to run a fast break style,” he said during his first press conference in Montreal, the one called to announce his hiring. “If we’re not up there this season, then there’s no one to blame but me.” Les Quebecois are “up there’” in second place after 42 games, much of their position due to a quick start in the season.

It appears, however, that their legs are giving way in much the same fash­ion as Kells has predicted earlier this season and. with six games left in the schedule, are in danger of being over­hauled by the Wings and, although a re­mote possibility, the Boston Bolts.

“Philadelphia and Boston will come on at the end of the season,” Kells predicted, “and Montreal will sag and get tired.”

“Unlike Philadelphia and Boston, which play a shooting game, Les Que­becois play a running game. Running teams wear down towards the end of the schedule.”

In the playoffs — a brand new sea­son, he says — he would pick Philadel­phia over Montreal but first, and it is with confidence that he says it, the Tomahawks will take home the Nations Cup.

A strong draft…

“Definitely,” he remarks. The reasons he believes so strongly are the likes of Doug Hayes, Jimmy Johnston. Chuck Medhurst, Ted Greeves and Doug Barrie — all of them selections from the draft, all of them shoring up the holes he felt he had to fill to repeat as NLL champion.

Except for the league rule which stipulates a senior cannot qualify for rookie of the year honors. Hayes — who played at that level in western Canada last year — would be a natural.  As it is, the 6’3” 220-pound forward is without doubt the most valuable player on the Tomahawks’ roster and. possibly, in the league.

He was chosen fourth in the draft — behind Dave Durante. Al Lewthwaite and Ken Winzoski — but Kells says of him: ‘When he plays our system, he’s the best in the game.  He was the best in June, but in July and August, he wasn’t.”

Kells, as it seems most NLL team officials are, is considerably more forthright than his peers in other pro­fessional sport. Hayes, for example, was the offensive standout in a recent game at the Forum with four goals.

Way it is…

“He was lazy.” said Kells as candid­ly as he would tell the equipment man­ager that the bus would be leaving in half an hour. “You can score four goals,” said Kells, “and still not come back down on the floor to check.”

In last week’s battle at the Forum. Hayes had his scoring lead on the line and the Tomahawks were trailing.

John Davis, captain of Les Quebe­cois and a veteran who deserves a spot in any lacrosse hall of fame for his con­tributions in the 60s and 70s, had col­lected three points in the first two periods and had moved into the top scoring spot.

Hayes, shut out until the final 20 minutes, got two goals of the six that were scored to take a 14-11 victory. De­fence? Hayes must have been doing his part as Long Island kept Les Quebecois off the scoreboard.

Johnston, 21. who had been collared with the reputation as a “lazy player” during his junior career, has become a threat to every team in the league.

‘When they needed a big goal,” says Les Quebecois assistant coach Frank Wilbur, “it’s always Johnston.” Such was the case when Wilbur and Bishop watched Long Island defeat Quebec Caribou “When the score was tied, I said Johnston would score and he did.”

He wanted out…

Kells has an answer for Wilbur’s performance in junior. “If there was a pro league at the time, he would have been in it. He was that good. ” Kevin Parsons, dealt by Kells to ac­quire Lewthwaite, wouldn’t perform for Long Island. “He didn’t want to grind.” explained Kells, “and like a lot of NHL players, he wanted to change teams.

“I didn’t put him on the block be­cause other teams would think I wanted to get rid of him and I wouldn’t get as much for him. Then I heard about Lewthwaite and I made the deal with Boston for him.” Hayes, for all Kells’remarks about his lack of zip, is a producer. He scored 13 goals in three games that bridged the last week of July and the first of August and. in one of the matches, collected a record-tying eight goals. He brings his 91 goals and 109 assists into the Forum tomorrow night for another matchup with Davis, five points behind and hav­ing played one more game, and Les Quebecois.

Lewthwaite had much to do with Hayes’ two goals in the last game in which the teams met and, perhaps, Davis tells best why he was kept scoreless in that third period. “He got me dirty about three times,” said Davis. “Can’t blame the referees, though, they didn’t see him.” Lacrosse is that kind of game.

The sacrifice…

Bishop, meanwhile, continues to shake his head as he attempts to come up with the combination that will stop Long Island.

Les Quebecois, in their bid for quickness, have sacrificed height and strength — vital factors in this bruising game.

The tallest member on Les Quebe­cois’ roster was Ric Bossley, at 6’2”, who was unable to play this season be­cause of a leg injury. He was told there would be a spot for him on the team when he recovered but was traded off.

Sandy Lynch, 6’1”, the man in whom Bishop had placed so much hope at the beginning of the season, balked at Bish­op’s game ptan and he. too, was trad­ed.

At the top of the aggressiveness list and still with Les Quebecois is John Sheffield, 6’1”, and who gives 100 per cent every time out — a quality that is lacking in a number of his team­mates.

Aggressiveness was lost when, be­cause of their inability to adapt to the Bishop system. Michel Blanchard and Gord Osinchuk left the club.

A little general…

Ken Winzoski. 5’9” and 175 pounds, is the prototype of Bishop’s philosophy and indeed, the coach and general manager has described him often as his “little floor general.”

Kells, on the other hand, went for the staples of beef and strength in the draft and. in that, perhaps is the an­swer to combatting Bishop s plan of deftness blended with speed.

With evidence like seven victories in eight games, there is little choice in the verdict of which system works best — at least in this season and with the players available.

Another chapter will be written to­morrow night at the Forum and. as it is in all sport, winning does much to sway the minds of the judges.

The ultimate assessment, of course, is the playoffs. And doesn’t the best team always win?

Leave a comment

error: Content is protected !!